Charles Curtiss Archive   |   Trotskyist Writers Index   |   ETOL Main Page


C.C.

America vs. Japan in Latin America

(April 1934)


From The Militant, Vol. VII No. 17, 28 April 1934, p. 2.
Transcribed & marked up by Einde O’ Callaghan for the Encyclopaedia of Trotskyism On-Line (ETOL).


The key to many of the policies of American imperialism, both in relation to Latin America and to Japan, may be found in the following facts and figures, the latter taken from a Panama newspaper.

A veritable flood of goods from Japan is reaching the Latin American market which, for the last 15 years, has been considered reserved for the U.S. While the amount of goods bearing the tale “Made in U.S.A.” is diminishing, the goods bearing the words “Made in Japan” are increasing in number, relatively to the amount of imports from other countries and absolutely in relation to the figures of each preceding years.

Silks; cambrics; food-stuffs; paper goods; articles of porcelain, crockery, glassware, and china; drug, medical and toilet articles, leather goods; bamboo; canvas shoes; rubber articles; toys; celluloid – these are the chief articles of import.
 

Japanese Exports

The value of the imports from Japan to Paraguay in pesos de oro:

1924

140,231

1925

223,678

1926

242,073

1927

276,944

1928

308,597

To Peru, in Japanese yen:

1928

1,758,651

1929

2,601,545

1930

2,234,774

1931

729,205

1932

840,574

1933
(first six months only)

1,857,807

In Panama, where three years ago Japanese goods were unknown, they now hold second place. The figures given are in Panamanian dollars, and for the months cited only.

Before May, 1931, there was a monthly import of less than $15,000.

May 1931

$ 29,180

Nov. 1931

40,308

July 1933

94,025

Aug. 1933

109,745


Tendency Alarms U.S.

These are but examples of a general tendency that is causing, to say the least, a great deal of anxiety in the U.S. These figures are not large, but the fact that Japan’s exports to the Latin American markets can gain, as in Brazil, where for the first hall of 1933, the increase was 113%, to Cuba, a relatively changing position, a 173%, and to Peru, where the increase was 322%, is symptomatic of process that in the final analysis can only be changed by imperialist war.

In this time of crisis every shred, scrap and crumb of foreign market assumes a great importance. A teaspoonful of water to a man dying of thirst is much more important than a well of water in a region where there is plenty. These two facts – of Japan’s increasing foreign trade in Latin America and the great demand for every dollar’s worth of market by the U.S. – must be taken careful account of when reading the reports of international conferences.
 

U.S. Exports to South America

Part of the meaning behind the Pan-American congresses, treaties, etc., can be found in these figures of U.S. exports to South America. These figures are taken from the World Year Book:

1928

$480,814,000

1929

539,309,000

1930

337,508,000

1931

158,691,000

1932

97,132,000

These figures for 1932 are less than 20% of those for 1929. The same process is at work on a world scale as the following figures for the world export of the U.S. show:

1928

$5,128,356,000

1929

5,240,995,000

1930

3,843,181,000

1931

2,424,289,000

1932

1,611,016,000


Do the Figures Spell War?

Japanese exports in these years decreased also, but nowhere near the degree of the other powers.

 

           In Yen

1928

1,971,955,000

1929

2,148,618,000

1930

1,469,852,000

1931

1,146,981,000

1932

1,409,992,000

While in 1932 U.S. exports dropped to 31% of the 1929 figures, Japanese exports only dropped, at the end of the year 1932, to 67%.

Does this inequality mean war in which the American and Japanese wage slaves will, among other things, fight to determine whether Japanese or North American goods shall be found in the bazaars of India, the fairs of South America and the market places generally of the world?


Charles Curtiss Archive   |   ETOL Main Page

Last updated: 23 April 2016