ISJ 2 Index | Main Newspaper Index
Encyclopedia of Trotskyism | Marxists’ Internet Archive
International Socialism, Autumn 2008
International Socialist Tendency
Statement on the global economic crisis
From International Socialism 2 : 120, Autumn 2008.
Copyright © International Socialism.
Copied with thanks from the International Socialism Website.
Marked up by Einde O’Callaghan for ETOL.
The following statement was issued by the Coordination of the
International
Socialist Tendency on 13 October 2008.
- The extraordinary waves of panic that have swept through global financial markets in the past few
weeks have filled ordinary working people around the world with a
mixture of anger, bewilderment and fear. It has become evident to
everyone that the existing capitalist economic system isn’t
working, and that we face a major historical turning point. What
isn’t clear is what the consequences will be and what can be
done.
- The financial crash of September–October 2008 has confirmed that the world is facing a
major economic crisis. The development of this crisis has been
channelled through the neoliberal economic policy regime that was
set in place in the late 1970s and the early 1980s, in particular
with the deregulation of financial markets and their greater power
to engage in large-scale speculation across state borders.
Nevertheless, the real causes of the credit crunch lie in the
long-term crisis of profitability with which global capitalism has
been struggling since the end of the 1960s. The recovery in the rate
of profit during the late 1980s and early 1990s thanks to capital
restructuring and a sharp increase in the rate of exploitation was
only partial. Since the late 1990s, the US Federal Reserve Board has
sought to prevent a major economic crisis by flooding the American
and world economy with cheap credit. Workers whose real wages have
stagnated or shrunk in most of the major economies have been
encouraged to borrow in order to maintain demand for goods and
services. It was the explosion of the resulting speculative bubble,
centred on the housing market, that detonated the onset of the
credit crunch in August 2007.
- Unlike the earlier financial crashes of the neoliberal era – Mexico 1994, East and Southeast
Asia 1997, Russia 1998, Argentina 2001 – the present one
originated in the very heart of the capitalist system, in the United
States. It is spreading to affect the entire world economy. European
banks were major customers for the mortgages repackaged as complex
financial derivatives that have now gone toxic. The big exporting
economies – Germany, Japan, China – are being sucked into the
crisis as the markets for their goods shrink. A world recession on
the scale of those in the mid-1970s and early 1980s is now in
prospect.
- The crisis is being exacerbated by a sharp increase in the rate of inflation, especially for energy
and basic consumer goods. This is a consequence of the boom in the
world economy, driven by the credit bubble, in the mid-2000s,
reinforced by the activities of speculative investors in the oil and
other commodity markets. Higher inflation is forcing down living
standards globally, and, in the Global South, threatening the very
survival of many poor people.
- The response of the leading capitalist states – and in particular of the US – has been to
seek to shore up the financial system with large-scale state
intervention, including the nationalisation or government-organised
rescues of major banks and other financial institutions. These
policies have blown an enormous hole in the neoliberal ideology of
the free market. But the aim of these interventions has not been to
protect the jobs, living standards and homes of ordinary working
people. They are intended to preserve the capitalist system and to
protect the chiefs of the big banks that survive the process of
mergers and reorganisation from the consequences of their
speculative gambles. Socialists, trade unionists and
anti-globalisation activists should demand instead the
nationalisation without compensation of the banks in order to turn
them into instruments for meeting the needs of working people and
the poor.
- Our rulers plainly intend instead to force the burden of the crisis onto the backs of working
people and the poor. This is clear from the warnings of the European
Central Bank and the Bank of England against the “secondary
effects” of inflation. They are telling trade unionists not to
seek wage increases that compensate them for the rise in the cost of
living. This is reinforced by other policies – for example, in
Britain, by a 2 percent limit on public sector pay. Yet no one
claims that wage increases have been responsible for the surge in
inflation – indeed in many countries pay was squeezed well before
price rises sped up. Partly thanks to the downward pressure on
wages, corporations enjoyed sharply increased profits in the
mid-2000s. These profits can now be used to pay for the wage
increases needed to protect living standards. If the bosses react by
pushing up prices, the answer lies in placing the economy under
public and democratic control. The workers’ movement needs also to
challenge institutions such as, in Europe, the Single European Act,
the European Central Bank and the Growth and Stability Pact. Their
function is to hard-wire into the European Union the very neoliberal
policies that have been rejected in successive referendums in
France, the Netherlands and Southern Ireland, and that are barriers
to defending jobs, living standards and homes in the current
economic crisis.
- Another dimension to the economic crisis is the effect that it is having in exacerbating the
conflicts among the world’s ruling classes. This is evident
internally, in the political chaos in Washington and in the
disagreements within the European Union on how to deal with the
crisis. But it also operates at the global level as well. In August
2008 the Russian-Georgian war highlighted how the attempt by the US
to entrench its global hegemony by expanding Nato deep into Eurasia
threatened to rekindle the kind of inter-imperialist rivalries that
dominated world politics in the 20th century. Even if the efforts of
the American state to rescue the banking system are successful, the
result will be hugely to increase US government debt. This will make
American capitalism even more dependent than it already is on the
readiness of the rulers of the high-exporting economies of East Asia
and of the Gulf oil sheikhdoms to continue lending them money. As
the experience of the 20th century showed, greater economic
interdependence – today above all between the US and China –
can, rather than reduce geopolitical tensions, actually feed them.
The US war drive that began after 11 September 2001 is likely to
continue whoever wins the presidential election, and hence it
remains imperative to continue to build a global movement against
it.
- The relationship between economic crisis and the class
struggle is complex and mediated by the political context in which
they interact. Moreover, the precise combination of job losses and
higher prices in a given country is likely to have a major impact on
whether workers are likely to respond with aggressive resistance or
demoralised acquiescence. But we can be sure that the coming period
will see big social and political movements all over the world
provoked by the crisis and its consequences. The duty of
revolutionary socialists is, as ever, to throw themselves into these
movements, and to help make them as united, militant, and powerful
as possible. But, whatever the circumstances, we have to insist on
the fact that what we are confronting is not simply the crisis of
neoliberalism as an ideology and as a policy regime, but of the
capitalist mode of production itself. The huge suffering and
instability that the present crisis will generate are consequence of
the logic of capital. We need to put in its place a different social
logic, a socialist logic, based on democratic and collective control
of the economy and on genuine planning, in which workers and
consumers participate in directing production to meet their needs.
This means that revolutionary socialists need to put their efforts
into building their own organisations, and also into developing a
broader radical left that can begin to present a credible and
principled alternative to capitalism.
Top of page
ISJ 2 Index | Main Newspaper Index
Encyclopedia of Trotskyism | Marxists’ Internet Archive
Last updated on 2 February 2017