V. I. Lenin
APRIL 24–29 (MAY 7–12), 1917
10
SPEECH ON THE NATIONAL QUESTION
APRIL 29 (MAY 12)
NEWSPAPER REPORT
Comrade Lenin recalled that the Polish Social-Democrats
were against the right to national self-determination in 1903, when the
question was not raised in the prospect of a socialist revolution. The
specific character of their stand on the national question is due to their
peculiar position in Poland; the tsarist oppression fed the nationalistic
passions of the bourgeois and petty-bourgeois sections of Poland. The
Polish Social-Democrats had to go through a desperate struggle against the
“socialists” (P.P.S) who were even prepared to
have a European war for the sake of Poland’s liberation, and only they, the
Polish Social-Democrats,
spreading the feelings of international solidarity among the Polish
workers, led them closer to the workers of Russia. However, their attempt
to impose a rejection of the right to self-determination on the socialists
of the oppressor nations is extremely erroneous and in the event
of success could result in nothing more than the adoption of a chauvinistic
stand by the Russian Social-Democrats. By rejecting the oppressed nations’
right to self-determination, the socialists of the oppressor nations become
chauvinists, giving support to their own bourgeoisie. Russian socialists
must work to secure freedom to secede for the oppressed nations,
while the socialists of the oppressed nations must maintain freedom to
integrate, both taking formally different (essentially the same) ways
towards the same goal: the international organisation of the
proletariat. Those who say that the national question has been solved
within the bourgeois system tend to forget that it has been solved (but not
in every case) only in the west of Europe, where the purity of the
population is sometimes as high as 90 per cent, but not in the east, where
the purity of the population is limited to only 43 per cent. Finland’s
example shows that the national question is in practice on the order of the
day and that the alternative is support for the imperialist bourgeoisie or
the duty of international solidarity, which does not allow of any violation
of the will of the oppressed nations. The Mensheviks, who invited the
Finnish Social-Democrats to “wait” until the Constituent Assembly and
settle the question of autonomy together with it, actually spoke
out in the spirit of the Russian imperialists.
Pravda No. 46, May 15 (2), 1917 |
Printed from the Pravda text |
Notes